BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//UCLA Sustainability - ECPv6.15.18//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:UCLA Sustainability
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://sustain.ucla.edu
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for UCLA Sustainability
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20150101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20161013T170000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20161013T190000
DTSTAMP:20260405T141809
CREATED:20160925T110052Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20160925T110108Z
UID:5500-1476378000-1476385200@sustain.ucla.edu
SUMMARY:Luskin Innovators Speaker Series: Jon Christensen
DESCRIPTION:Featured author: Jon Christensen \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPaper: Environmental Bonds Should Equitably Benefit All Communities: Looking Forward Based on an Analysis of Prop 84\nDate/Time: 10/13 5-7pm\nPanelists (to be invited): Assembly Member Eduardo Garcia\, Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de Leon\, Alina Bokde (director of the Los Angeles Neighborhood Land Trust)\, Alfredo Gonzalez (Resources Legacy Fund)\nSynopsis of paper: \n“A systematic analysis of spending under Proposition 84\, the last major environmental bond approved by California voters\, which in 2006 authorized $5.4 billion to improve parks\, natural resource protection\, and water quality\, supply and safety. Most of that money has been spent. And for the first time ever\, we have good enough data to ask some crucial questions.\n \nWhere was that funding spent? Who benefited? And was the spending prioritized as voters expected? The report  analyzed $2 billion spent on 2\,174 projects in California communities and found decidedly mixed results.”
URL:https://sustain.ucla.edu/event/luskin-innovators-speaker-series/
LOCATION:Luskin School of Public Affairs\, room 2355\, UCLA
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR